Skip to content

Is Over Centralization Putting Federal Health Policy at Risk

hindu editorial analysis 06-03-2025
Topic: GS2 – Governance, GS2 – Social Justice – Health
Context
  • The Supreme Court has ruled that domicile-based reservations in post-graduate medical admissions violate the right to equality under Article 14 of the Constitution.
 What is the supreme court ruling?
  • The Supreme Court, in the Dr. Tanvi Behl vs Shrey Goyal (2025) case, ruled that domicile-based reservations in post-graduate medical admissions violate Article 14 of the Constitution, emphasizing meritocracy over State-specific quotas.
  • The decision removes States’ ability to reserve seats for local candidates, impacting their efforts to retain specialists in public healthcare.
  • This ruling strengthens central control over medical admissions but may discourage State investment in government medical colleges, potentially widening regional healthcare disparities.

Is Over Centralization Putting Federal Health Policy at Risk

Role of Domicile Quotas in State Healthcare Planning

  • Domicile-based reservations help States retain doctors who are familiar with the local healthcare system, ensuring a steady supply of specialists.
  • States spend a large amount of money on medical education with the expectation that these graduates will serve the local population.
  • Unlike undergraduate courses that provide basic medical training, post-graduate programs are essential for creating specialists in various medical fields.
  • The Court’s reliance on past legal cases does not recognize the difference between undergraduate and post-graduate medical education.
  • Without domicile quotas, States will have to rely on hiring doctors from outside, which is often unpredictable and inefficient.

Effect on State Investment in Medical Education

Effect on State Investment in Medical Education

  • If States cannot ensure that their trained doctors will stay and serve locally, they may reduce their investment in medical colleges.
  • Competitive federalism encourages States to improve their medical institutions, but this decision might weaken that motivation.
  • Without domicile reservations, funding for medical colleges could decrease, leading to poor infrastructure and widening healthcare gaps.

Medical Education and Public Health Connection

  • The right to life under Article 21 includes access to quality healthcare, which is closely linked to medical education.
  • State medical colleges play a major role in public health, not just in education but also in providing healthcare services.
  • States need the power to decide admission policies to ensure that healthcare needs are met.
  • Too much central control over medical education can prevent States from effectively planning their healthcare systems.

Problems with a Strict Merit-Based System

  • The ruling assumes a rigid merit-based system but does not address flaws in medical entrance exams.
  • NEET-PG has structural issues, including cases where candidates with negative marks qualify due to percentile-based cutoffs.
  • In 2023, qualifying percentiles for NEET-PG were reduced to zero to fill vacant seats, showing inconsistencies in assessing merit.
  • Previous legal decisions have recognized that merit should consider social and regional factors, not just exam scores.
  • Domicile-based reservations help provide healthcare to underserved areas by ensuring specialists remain in their home States.

Need for a More Balanced Approach

  • The Court’s decision is based on older legal cases that do not reflect today’s urgent need for specialists, especially with rising diseases and past health crises.
  • Instead of removing domicile quotas completely, a better approach would be to link these reservations with service obligations.
  • Some States have already implemented policies where medical graduates must serve in public hospitals in exchange for reserved seats.
  • This ruling increases central control over medical admissions, which may lead to reduced State investment and wider regional disparities.
  • Over-centralization of medical education policies may harm the federal structure of healthcare.
  • A strong and sustainable healthcare system needs policies that balance merit, State autonomy, and public health needs.
Practice Question:  How does the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dr. Tanvi Behl vs Shrey Goyal (2025) on domicile-based reservations in post-graduate medical admissions affect State healthcare planning? Discuss its impact on medical education and competitive federalism. (250 Words /15 marks)

2. Who will apologise to the ‘Himalayans’?

Topic: GS3 – Environment – Environmental pollution and degradation
Context
  • Norway formally apologized for its past assimilation policies targeting indigenous groups, acknowledging cultural suppression and proposing corrective measures.
  • Similar challenges persist in the Himalayan region, where indigenous communities face resource exploitation and cultural erosion.

Who will apologise to the ‘Himalayans’

Norway’s Apology for Indigenous Assimilation Policies

  • Norway’s Parliament has issued a formal apology for past policies that aimed to assimilate indigenous groups such as the Sami, Kven, and Forest Finn peoples.
  • These policies, called Norwegianisation, were implemented between the 1850s and 1960s to suppress native languages and cultures.
  • The government has proposed measures to address ongoing discrimination, including protecting indigenous languages and monitoring inclusion efforts from 2027.
  • Despite these efforts, challenges remain, such as endangered Sami languages and inequalities in healthcare, education, and land rights.

Parallels Between Nordic and Himalayan Communities

  • Similar to Nordic regions, the Himalayan region also faces environmental challenges and historical exploitation of resources.
  • The Himalayan region spans 2,500 km from Afghanistan to northeast India, containing the world’s largest ice reserves after the poles.
  • This region is home to 52 million people from various ethnic groups, including those in Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Ladakh, Arunachal Pradesh, Nepal, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.
  • Many of these communities have experienced assimilation pressures through colonial rule, post-independence policies, and modern economic changes.

Impact of Colonial Rule on Himalayan Communities

  • British colonial policies disrupted Himalayan trade and local economies.
  • In the northeast, trade blockades and forced agreements affected goods like tea, gold, silk, and opium.
  • In Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand, forests were exploited for timber to build railway tracks, leading to large-scale deforestation.
  • Between 1853 and 1910, over 80,000 km of railway tracks were laid, destroying vast forested areas in Garhwal and Kumaon.

Post-Independence Policies and Economic Changes

  • In the early years after independence, policies aimed to respect tribal ways of life.
  • However, by the 5th and 6th Five-Year Plans, resource exploitation intensified, disrupting local ecosystems and cultures.
  • In the 1990s, economic changes forced Himalayan states to generate revenue, leading to reliance on tourism and hydropower.

Challenges of Hydropower Projects

  • Hydropower projects were promoted as a way to generate state revenue and reduce financial dependence.
  • Arunachal Pradesh was expected to meet 40% of India’s power demand after completing major hydropower projects.
  • However, these projects often ignored local laws and customary land ownership, leading to displacement and cultural erosion.
  • The involvement of bureaucrats, politicians, and corporations in large-scale land acquisitions led to environmental damage and loss of traditional practices.

Need for Recognition and Justice

  • Norway’s apology for past injustices highlights the importance of acknowledging historical wrongs and committing to reconciliation.
  • The Himalayan region has also faced resource exploitation and cultural erosion, but there has been no formal recognition of these issues.
  • Sustainable and inclusive development is necessary to protect the cultural identity and environment of Himalayan communities.
  • The question remains whether similar accountability and justice will be extended to the affected communities in the Himalayas.
Practice Question:  How have assimilation policies impacted indigenous communities globally? Compare Norway’s approach to reconciliation with the challenges faced by indigenous groups in the Himalayan region. (150 Words /10 marks)

If you like this Editorial don’t forget to check this –Indias AI Safety Institute A Game Changer

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *