The Delimitation Promise Game Changer or Empty Talk

Topic: GS2 – Governance

Context

The proposed delimitation in India has reignited debates over the imbalance between population growth and parliamentary representation, potentially shifting political power toward the North.

Analysis of the news:

Understanding Delimitation and Its Rationale

• Delimitation in India serves to ensure fair representation by adjusting parliamentary constituency boundaries according to population shifts.
• However, since 1976, the process has been frozen to prevent penalizing states that successfully controlled population growth, particularly in the south.
• This has led to an imbalance, where states like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar remain underrepresented compared to Tamil Nadu and Kerala.
• The concern is that the upcoming delimitation in 2029 may shift political power toward the North, where population growth has remained high, thereby altering the country’s political equilibrium.

Legal and Constitutional Basis of Delimitation

• The Indian Constitution mandates delimitation under Article 82, with an independent Delimitation Commission responsible for implementing it.
• Historically, it was conducted in 1952, 1962, and 1972, but the 42nd Constitutional Amendment (1976) froze it, later extending the freeze in 2001 until 2026.
• This delay has created a situation where states with controlled population growth risk losing representation, while states with higher birth rates stand to gain, leading to concerns about fairness and regional equity.

The South vs. North Divide in Representation

• Opponents of delimitation argue that southern states, despite having lower populations, contribute more to India’s economy through per capita income, taxation, and better infrastructure.
• The North, in contrast, faces challenges like high unemployment, poverty, and inadequate infrastructure.
• This has led to concerns that the South is subsidizing the North, and if delimitation proceeds without addressing these disparities, it could deepen intrastate inequalities.
• This phenomenon resembles the Red Queen effect, where the South must keep advancing merely to maintain its current political standing.

Comparative Global Perspectives on Delimitation

• Internationally, countries adopt different approaches to delimitation. New Zealand and South Africa enshrine it within constitutional frameworks, while India and Japan manage it through ordinary legislation.
• Judicial intervention remains a debated issue, as seen in Meghraj Kothari v. Delimitation Commission (1966), where the Supreme Court upheld delimitation orders as final to prevent election delays.
• Recent rulings, such as those on Jammu & Kashmir’s delimitation, further highlight the complexities of balancing legal frameworks and political realities.

Women’s Representation and the Delimitation Link

• The Women’s Reservation Bill (2023), which mandates 33% reservation for women in Parliament and state assemblies, is directly tied to delimitation.
• This means meaningful gender representation will be delayed until at least 2029, raising concerns about whether India is prioritizing equitable political participation.

Impact on Marginalized Communities: SCs, STs, and Migrants

• Delimitation also affects Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), migrants, and socio-religious minorities.
• Article 330(2) mandates proportional reservation of seats for SCs and STs, but the allocation is still based on the 2001 Census, despite significant demographic shifts.
• For instance, the Bihar Caste-Based Survey (2023) found that SC and ST populations have increased, yet their representation remains static, leading to underrepresentation of these communities.

Proposed Solutions to Address the Imbalance

• A purely population-based seat allocation could shift power disproportionately toward the Hindi heartland, reducing representation for southern states.
• Scholars like Alistair McMillan suggest expanding the Lok Sabha to accommodate demographic shifts without diminishing any state’s representation.
• Others, like Milan Vaishnav, propose reforming the Rajya Sabha to counterbalance the North’s increasing dominance.

Concerns Over Gerrymandering and Political Manipulation

• A major fear surrounding delimitation is gerrymandering, where political parties manipulate electoral boundaries to secure long-term dominance.
• However, some advocate for an alternative approach—expanding parliamentary seats while decentralizing power to state governments.
• This could enhance grassroots democracy, ensuring broader political participation, particularly for women and marginalized castes, in line with Alexis de Tocqueville’s vision of equality of conditions.

Conclusion:

• The upcoming delimitation exercise is a complex interplay of demographics, law, and politics, requiring careful navigation to maintain fairness in India’s electoral system.
• A broad political consensus is necessary to update India’s electoral infrastructure, as seen in the rare agreement on the 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill.
• Dutch political scientist Arend Lijphart’s idea of consociational democracy—where power is shared among diverse groups—could serve as a guiding principle.
• If managed well, delimitation has the potential to enhance electoral democracy and strengthen India’s democratic longevity.

Practice Question: The upcoming delimitation exercise in India has sparked debates over regional representation, demographic shifts, and political power balance. Critically analyze the impact of delimitation on federalism, socio-economic disparities, and democratic equality. Suggest measures to ensure fair and equitable representation.  (250 Words /15 marks)

If you like this  Editorial don’t forget to check this –Law and AI Clash Is Order at Risk or a New Era Beginning